- General conditions
- Labour law
- Banking law and capital markets
- Construction law and architects law
- Professional liability
- Compliance
- Date Protection Law
- D&O liability
- Law of succession
- Industrial property protection
- Family law
- Corporate law
- Commercial lease
- Third party liability
- Commercial law
- Agency and distributorship
- Real estate
- Insolvency law
- International private law
- IT law
- International commercial law
- Sale of Goods Law
- Lease
- Trademark law
- Mediation
- Healthcare law
- Rent and lease
- Public construction and planning law
- Law of administrative offences
- Product liability
- Travel law
- School and examination law
- Damages
- Arbitration law
- Social law
- Social insurance
- Sports law
- Tax law
- Criminal tax law
- Criminal law
- Transport and shipping law
- Execution of will as a part of the inheritance law
- Environmental law
- Accident law and regulation of accidents
- Mergers & Acquisition
- Copyright law and media law
- Associations and trusts
- Public procurement law
- Traffic law
- Judicial execution and enforcement of a judgment
- Insurance law
- Contract law
- Commercial criminal law
- Administrative law
- Condominium law
- Law on competition
- Business law
- Law on sale by court order
Compliance
So far the introduction of so-called compliance programs has been considered to be a task of international major corporations willing and capable to treat themselves to such „luxury“ or who are eventually obliged to do so by the legal systems of other states in which they are active. This perception is not correct. National statutory provisions have established a general duty to implement and execute a compliance management system long since. The very law on protection of business secrets creates a duty for each entrepreneur to consider the implementation of at least a partial system, related to the protection of the company’s know-how. It is in particular the economic side effects of an adequate compliance management system that could be the true motive for its implementation. The evidence of a functioning system (as such) may not only contribute to the reduction of civil and criminal liabilities, but also to secure claims for trade secrets and thereby contribute to a medium-term to long-term reduction of costs (in particular reduction of insurance premium for D&O and other pecuniary damage liability insurances).
Activities
- Preparation and enforcement of a pragmatic compliance management system

Dr. Stefan Rein
Lawyer
No news available.